mcCloud Summary:
In his article Vocabulary of Comics, Scott McCloud attempts to explain the
difference in reading visual text and regular text. He argues that it is more
interesting and easier to read visual texts because we, as humans, are able to
relate ourselves to the pictures. No matter what the picture is actually of, we
tend to visualize the picture as ourselves. This is because want everything to
be about us. McCloud says this is because we are selfish creatures.
OPINIONS:
I found this article very interesting
because I find this true of myself. This article was easy for me to read
because I was engaged in the pictures and I found myself enjoying the article
more. I also found myself to read this article more quickly because I was
interested in what mcCloud was explaining.
Bernhardt Summary:
In his article Seeing the Text, Stephen Bernhardt attempts to explain the
importance of allowing students to use visually appealing texts. He argues that
this could increase their understanding and writing ability because it
increases the readers’ interest. He also states that the design of the text can
give the reading more depth and understanding in the classroom. Students would
be able to relate the text to other things outside of the classroom more
easily.
QUESTION:
I
would say I do struggle with this type of writing because I find it “boring” to
read. If the content in the text is not something to my interest, I struggle to
keep my focus on the reading. In the first article, the comic helped to get the
point of the reading across to me. This article however was the opposite. I
found it more towards the uninteresting end of the writing spectrum. The
pictures helped to illustrate the main points of what the writer was trying to
say.
OPINIONS:
I
enjoyed this article because I thought I was kind of the only person who found
reading articles with interesting text or pictures easier to read than standard
printed texts. This article made me realize that it is a problem everyone
struggles with.
Good response, Megan. Your concise summaries hit upon the main purposes of both readings, and I like your reaction to these relatively high- and low-visual articles.
ReplyDelete