I am able to make a connection to the Swales article because
he also talks about the concept of a genre. In his article he only simply
defined the term as writings of different types, whereas in this article it
loaded much more meaning onto the term. For example, there were three different
opinions on what “genre” meant. It can mean anything from something only people
in a particular discourse community understand to using a genre as a learning
tool. I am also able to relate this to Porter’s article about discourse
communities because he explained that a discourse community has a certain
language that others may not understand. This article explained that sometimes
the genre of a certain group may not be comprehended by non-members.
In Bawarshi’s essay, he clarifies what the term “genre”
means in other meaningful languages such as French and Latin. In French it
means “sort” or “kind”, and in Latin it means “to generate”. He then goes on to
explain that a genre is a “transparent lens” for classifying texts and
different kinds of things but maybe we should be trying to study the things
themselves. He also says that genres can generate the exchanges of language in
discourse communities.
Swales defines genre simply as a particular type of writing
or text that belongs to a certain discourse community. He explains that when we
write, we tend to look to a familiar genre that is appropriate for the type of
writing we are doing. A genre is normally easily recognized by outsiders,
meaning anyone can identify what genre a piece of writing belongs to. Genres are
able to change with new members or old members leaving, or even if the group
just thinks it’s best to critique the genre.
These two authors both would agree that a genre is a type of
writing or text that belongs to a specific group. Bawarshi went about the
definition in a different way explaining it as transparent. He said maybe we
should focus on studying the particular “thing” instead of just the pieces of
writing, or maybe consider both. He also said that genres allow members of
discourse communities to communicate easily. Swales argues that a genre can
usually be identified by non-members of the group. He also does not distinguish
the group as a discourse community as did Bawarshi. Swales says that
non-members tend to use these different genres for themselves easily as
guidance for their own writing.
In my opinion, I think Swales’ definition is most
appropriate because we as students use different genres in our writing. We are
familiar with the different genres and we are knowledgeable about the different
types. I also think this is most appropriate because we use them as “tools” to
help us with our writing skills. We learn how to write in different genres and
it is not too difficult to understand. Bawarshi makes it sound like genres can
only be used by the members of the discourse community because they will be the
only people reading and understanding their genre.
Overall, I thought this article was quite interesting
because I had no idea there were so many interpretations of genres. I never
thought about the concept of a genre being so complicated and in depth but at
the same time I understood it. It makes sense that a genre can be used to learn
about other groups and discourse communities to enhance your own learning.
Great post! Very thorough, insightful responses.
ReplyDelete