In her article “
The
Politics of Teaching Literate Discourse”, Lisa Delpit attempts to explain
that anyone can overcome their primary discourse. She argues that if teachers
have the ambition to encourage African-American students to learn, then the
students will learn. She also says that the goal is not to erase an
individual’s primary discourse language, but to add new discourses to it. It
makes the individual more successful and more interesting to read when things
are written in their native tongue. She gives many examples of successful
African American individuals who grew up in a rough community or had parents
with low levels of education. Delpit explains the ways in which teachers can
help their students succeed and help them to become “learners” instead of
“nonlearners”.
It is very easy to make a connection to Gee’s article
because she challenges this article in her own writing. While she explains that
she agrees with him on most arguments he makes, she does disagree with a couple
points. Gee’s opinion is that a dominant discourse cannot be learned in a
classroom setting. It has to be learned by being an “apprentice”, or
participating in that discourse for yourself before you fully understand it.
This is where Delpit challenges him. She argues that dominant discourses CAN be
learned in the classroom, it’s just a matter of the individual. If a teacher
and student are willing to put the time and effort into learning then it can be
achieved. She says most students are nonlearners and that is why they do not
learn a new dominant discourse.
In my opinion I think she does succeed in persuading me to
her counter-points because she uses many examples in her writing. She is
proving that you can learn a dominant primary discourse in the classroom,
whereas Gee’s opinion is it has to be hands-on, or you have to be an apprentice
to learn another discourse. Most of her examples exist in African American
students because they had a hard time growing up and becoming educated. But she
explains how the teachers’ willingness to push the students gave them the
opportunity to become a successful individual.
I can imitate her strategy by using my primary dominant
discourse to learn new dominant discourses. Delpit explained that sometimes it
engages the reader if you use a discourse that is unfamiliar to them. Also, if
I push myself to learn at my fullest potential it is possible for me to learn a
new dominant discourse in the classroom. I think this is helpful because it
will make my writing sound more educated and professional.
I found this article to be a different approach to looking
at dominant and primary discourses. The examples she gave is what I found to be
most intriguing because the stories of the peoples’ lives and how they grew up
was almost encouraging. It makes me want to do better when it comes to my
writing. I think if teachers are willing to push their students to do their
best work, why shouldn’t students do the same?
Another great response, Megan. Very well-thought-out responses and an accurate representation of the author's main ideas.
ReplyDelete